The BNP Paribas tournament ended Sunday with two intriguing finals. Vera Zvonareva of Russia defeated Ana Ivanovic for the women’s championship and Rafael Nadal blanked Andy Murray to win the men’s title. The two matches weren’t examples of exemplary tennis in the least, instead they were illustrations of mind over matter and sheer will over the elements.
The biggest winner of the day was the wind. It whipped inside the stadium, making hats fly and debris sail. It frayed nerves and sparked tempers by pushing balls wide and way past the white lines of the brilliant blue court of the Indian Wells Tennis Center. With gusts sometimes clocking 50 mph, the players found themselves battling more than just the guy or lady standing on the other side of the net. Mother nature played a major part in separating the men from the boys and the women from the girls.
Zvonereva was known for years as the player more likely to bury her face in her towel and bawl her eyes out during changeovers than winning titles. Zvonereva’s trail of tears and broken rackets had spread from Moscow to Miami and her perceived mental fragility was a real hindrance in her being taken seriously as a top player from both her fellow tour mates and the press. On Sunday, Vera dried her eyes and handled the blustery conditions like a seasoned, mature pro, unlike her higher ranked and more successful opponent Ivanovic. After trading multiple breaks during the first set, Vera hunkered down and took control of the tiebreak after Ana faltered. During the second set, she controlled the rallies by keeping the ball low, in the court, and allowing Ana the flail away, making error after error. She wrapped up the set 6-2 and pocketed over $800,000 (she won the doubles too with partner Victoria Azarenka).
The men’s final was touted as a blockbuster bout between the tour’s best players. Rafael Nadal, the number one ranked player and 2007 winner against Andy Murray, the tour’s giant killer and Britain’s next great hope to win..anything. That match was anything but. Neither player scored an ace and both had more errors than winners. The determining factor was the same as the women’s final: The ability to adapt to the conditions, and Rafa won decisively. The 6-1, 6-2 drubbing was surprising because Murray was supposed to be the braniac of the tour. His versatile game and willingness to think on his feet were celebrated throughout the tennis world. However, he whinged and whined over calls. He cursed the wind and his shots landed in the net more than on the court. Nadal was the player who adjusted his serve, directed his shots with the wind, kept his feet moving, and drew Murray into the forecourt with clever slices and drop shots. On Sunday, Rafa was the tennis genius and Murray was the petulant loser. So much can be said about Rafa’s performance during this tournament, but I’m thrilled to see that he is finally getting the respect he deserves as a brilliant tactician.
Which makes it all the more surprising because during the semifinals, Murray used all of his wiles to defeat number two ranked and All Around King of Tennis, Roger Federer. Murray notched his fourth straight win over Federer by attacking his increasingly unreliable backhand and denying Roger the pace he needs to control a point. By the third set after a nasty fall, Murray had demoralized Federer so much that he only managed to eek out one game. The response to Federer’s latest collapse was one of resignation from his devoted fans. They now are beginning to realize that the dominance that Federer once had is no more. They are also frustrated by his apparent lack of initiative to change the situation. After testing out Darren Cahill, the deal fell through and Roger still remains coachless and unable/unwilling to change his approach towards his rivals.
Andy Roddick, Rafa’s semifinal opponent on the other hand is having one of the best starts he’s had in years. After making the semifinals in Australia, winning a title in Memphis, and making the final four in Indian Wells, Roddick has a lot to feel good about. After losing to Nadal after a closely fought second set, he went out a couple of hours later and won the doubles title with Mardy Fish. See what a new coach and a loss of 15 pounds have wrought? Roddick may not win another Grand Slam title, but he can guarantee that he’ll remain in the mix. Along with John Isner’s great performance, American tennis fans had plenty to cheer about in the desert.
Some other thoughts:
-Can we please once and for all let go of the Williams vs. Indian Wells mess? Face reality. They are never going to play there again. Stop telling them to forgive and forget. Let the WTA deal with the situation.
-Can FSN find another color commentator other than Justin Gimelstob? His performance was without a doubt the worst of any commentator I have ever had the displeasure of seeing. During the coverage, (what little we saw of it) when he wasn’t making all the wrong predictions and conclusions, he wasted time drooling over various women in the stands. His embarrassing interview with Kate Walsh (WTF?) was truly the nadir of sports broadcasting. Tennis fans deserve better than a lout and a burping starlet. I know I sure as hell do.
-Speaking of FSN, why pay for rights to the tournament when you aren’t bothering to show it? To pre-empt and cut coverage in favor of high school wrestling and poker just seems like a complete waste of money-especially if you are trying to get more ratings. Here’s some advice, catch the clue bus and show some live tennis if you want tennis fans to tune in.
Recent Comments