According to an article in the UK’s Daily Mail today, Officials at the All England Club confirmed that they factored “babeness” in scheduling women’s matches on Center Court at Wimbledon. Those who follow tennis closely have been hip to this sort of behavior for some time. Look how much Maria Sharapova has earned for her off court activities as compared to Amelie Mauresmo. Attractive female tennis players have often been photographed in bikinis, skimpy skirts, and sheer shirts for men’s magazines. The on court outfits some of them wear can easily be mistaken for Frederick’s Of Hollywood Lingerie.
Interestingly enough, when former men’s tour player Michael Stich pointedly remarked that the Women’s Tennis Association was, “selling sex”. He was roundly criticized. Well now with the admission of the TPTB of the AELTC, it seems that Mr. Stich simply wasn’t talking out of his rear end. The rationale according to these lunkheads was that the television audience would be more interested in seeing good looking girls play on Center Court. To me, it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to put two low ranked vixens on a show court in order to bring more attention to women’s tennis, which at this point is fighting tooth and nail against irrelevancy. I figure, if you’re in the top 3 and/or you’ve won Wimbledon before, you should always play on Center Court because it’s like you EARNED it instead of just looking hot in a pair of tennis panties. The call for equal pay just doesn’t hold up when the 59th ranked player in the world is conducting a clinic on error prone tennis on what’s dubbed the “Cathedral of Tennis”.
It’s disrespect pure and simple. If the WTA was worth anything, they would make a statement calling out the AELTC for this. Notice I said, “IF”. So far, I’ve heard nada from the ruling heads. They’re probably too busy putting together the, “Hot Babes of the WTA” 2010 calender.















Recent Comments