It was with breathless anticipation that I took my seat in the movie theater last night to catch the latest installment in the Harry Potter celluloid franchise. I’m not ashamed to admit it, I’m a Potterphile, at Pot Freak, a Harry lover–whatever fans of the books (and movies) call themselves. But after seeing Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince, I’m going to call myself disappointed.
The good stuff first. The film looks great. The art direction, costumes, special effects and cinematography are first rate. I was also impressed with the casting. Jim Broadbent as Horace Slughorn was a brilliant choice. Unlike the book’s version of Slughorn-a corpulent and self-deluded blowhard; Broadbent portrayed Slughorn as a twitchy, insecure, and rather pathetic creature. He brought energy and realism to a movie that was surprisingly short of both. Newcomer Jesse Cave was delightfully manic as Ron’s girlfriend, Lavendar Brown, but the casting director gets the biggest kudos for his choices of Hero Fiennes-Tiffin and Frank Dillane who share the role of Tom Riddle (Voldemort). Both young actors bear a striking resemblance to Ralph Fiennes who plays the adult Voldemort and both turn in very effective performances. With Fiennes-Tiffin’s creepy bad seed and Dillane’s dark angel, the movie goer is reminded of just how powerful an enemy Harry is up against.
Now to the bad stuff, and there was a lot. First, although the new characters were dynamite, the regulars were underused and as dull as dirt. From Michael Gambon’s lifeless (huh huh) Dumbledore to Maggie Smith’s listless McGonagall, the main players drifted in and out and left absolutely no lasting impression on me. Even the excellent Helene Bohnam-Carter as Bellatrix Lestrange looked bored out of her mind. Of course Alan Rickman is exempt because he’s the frigging man and Snape is the most awesome character ever. I will say that the filmmakers made the first of many mistakes by failing to stress the underlying conflict between Harry and Snape. Their interactions were limited in the film and their final battle left me more than a little cold.
As for the main players, Daniel Radcliffe as Harry, Rupert Grint as Ron, and Emma Watson as Hermoine they have grown immensely as actors. Radcliffe and Grint especially have developed a well timed comic chemistry. They did their best in scenes dealing with the abundance of teenage angst. They fell flat though when trying to get through the more salient plot points. Most of the time though they were caught looking expressionless in some of the movie’s most pivotal scenes. I was most disappointed with Bonnie Wright as Ginny Weasley. She was neither spunky nor intriguing (the traits we Potter fans love about Ginny) and I was at a loss as to what Harry could have possibly seen in her. Tom Felton was passable as Draco Malfoy. He did manage to show a couple of new expressions other than his usual sneer. And he did look very natty in his black suit. I would say something about Oliver and James Phelps who play George and Fred Weasley if they were in the film long enough. They weren’t though so I won’t.
The biggest gripe I have with the film is the storyline. Now I know that it’s next to impossible to add every scene to the book in the film. I wasn’t to upset with the deviations (the muggle bridge destruction, the attack at The Burrow). I had little problem with what they put in because I had a such a big problem with everything they left out. Now if you haven’t seen the movie and plan to go, you might as well stop here because I’m getting into some spoiler territory. Not too much-but enough…
Firstly, I knew from the fourth film that the writers and the director were painting themselves into a corner with their heavy ass edits. Now, with the end of the 6th film I know why they opted to split the 7th book into two films. It’s going to take both of them to try to explain everything they chose not to in the previous films. In Half Blood, David Yates and company seemed determined to rush the story to the cave scene so that they could show all the cool fire effects. What they fail miserably at is convincing the audience why Harry and Dumbledore had to get to the cave in the first place. Very little attention was made in trying to show how Dumbledore was preparing Harry to fight Voldemort. No thought was given in trying to portray Harry’s realization that he alone (with no help from the Ministry or even the Anti-Voldemort wizards) HAD to be the one to end Voldemort because he was the one who possessed the weapons in order to do it–something J.K. Rowling did so effectively in the book.
But the one thing that gets my knickers in a twist is the omission of the most important moment in the book. At risk of being called a total spoiler loser, all I will say is this: I deserved this scene. We who adore Dumbledore deserved this scene. I feel cheated and I just don’t understand the filmmakers’ reasoning behind not including it. As tragic as it was, that scene was a beautiful end to a chapter in Harry’s life and it provided a certain degree of closure that he never had before. The true meaning of leaving childhood behind and facing one’s mortality seemed to be completely lost in the quest to make things go boom. What a travesty.
So I give Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince a thumbs down. I never thought I could dislike a Potter movie more than Chamber of Secrets, but there you go.
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.
Recent Comments